The Actual News

Neutral summaries of your favorite news sources — just the facts.

US News

Latest developments and key stories from across the United States

Supreme Court dismisses case surrounding the death penalty

Supreme Court dismisses case surrounding the death penalty

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court has dismissed a case about the death penalty and IQ tests for prisoners on death row. The case involved whether IQ scores could impact a person's eligibility for the death penalty.

Key Facts

  • The case concerned the death penalty in the United States.
  • It focused on whether IQ tests should affect death penalty decisions for inmates.
  • The Supreme Court decided not to hear the case and dismissed it.
  • The decision means the current rules about IQ tests and the death penalty remain unchanged.
  • The case involved inmates who had been sentenced to death.
  • No changes to death penalty procedures were made by this dismissal.
  • The Supreme Court’s action ends this specific legal challenge.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Supreme Court sides with US company in claims over property seized in Cuban revolution

Supreme Court sides with US company in claims over property seized in Cuban revolution

Summary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8-1 in favor of a U.S. company, Havana Docks, which claims that four cruise lines used property in Cuba that was confiscated more than 65 years ago. The court said a lower court was wrong to dismiss the case, but the final decision has not been made yet.

Key Facts

  • Havana Docks operated docks in Havana, Cuba, before Fidel Castro's government took control.
  • The company is suing four cruise lines that visited Cuba during a brief period of eased relations under President Obama.
  • The Supreme Court ruled that the cruise lines used property that Havana Docks claims ownership of.
  • The case involves Title III of the Helms-Burton Act, which lets Americans sue companies using property taken by the Cuban government.
  • Previous U.S. presidents suspended this law to avoid upsetting allies and to help negotiate with Cuba.
  • President Trump activated this law in 2019, leading cruise lines to stop going to Cuba and change their routes.
  • A Miami judge ruled against the cruise lines, awarding Havana Docks over $400 million, but an appeals court reversed that decision.
  • The Supreme Court ruling sends the case back to the appeals court to review more arguments.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

California Fires Blaze Into an Ongoing Insurance Crisis

California Fires Blaze Into an Ongoing Insurance Crisis

Summary

A fast-moving wildfire called the Sandy Fire has forced thousands of people in California to evacuate. The fire has burned over 2,000 acres in Ventura County with one home destroyed and others damaged, highlighting ongoing problems with home insurance in the state. After last year’s large wildfires, many insurers canceled policies or limited coverage, leaving homeowners with fewer options and some relying on the state’s last-resort insurance plan.

Key Facts

  • The Sandy Fire in Ventura County burned more than 2,000 acres and is 22% contained as of Thursday morning.
  • One home has been completely destroyed, and several others have been damaged by the fire.
  • In January 2025, wildfires destroyed 18,000 homes in California and killed at least 31 people.
  • Nearly 41,000 acres have burned statewide so far this fire season, double the average of recent years.
  • Since 2022, major insurers, including State Farm, have canceled or limited home insurance in California due to higher wildfire risks and strict state rules on premium increases.
  • Many homeowners are forced to use the California FAIR Plan, the state’s last-resort fire insurance program.
  • A lawsuit alleges 16 insurance companies, including State Farm, conspired to cancel fire insurance policies before the January 2025 wildfires.
  • California regulators are pursuing legal action against State Farm for mishandling wildfire claims and may suspend its license in the state.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Republicans eyeing restrictions on Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund': Sources

Republicans eyeing restrictions on Trump's 'Anti-Weaponization Fund': Sources

Summary

Senate Republicans are planning to restrict or block two major spending requests from President Donald Trump: $1 billion for the White House East Wing expansion and nearly $1.8 billion for an "Anti-Weaponization Fund." This fund would pay allies who claim they were treated unfairly by the Biden administration, but some Republicans want to add rules to control how the money is used. If Republicans do not act, Democrats may try to add restrictions through amendments.

Key Facts

  • Senate Republicans want to remove $1 billion for the White House ballroom expansion due to low support.
  • The "Anti-Weaponization Fund" aims to compensate people who say they suffered injustices under the Biden administration.
  • The fund is part of a settlement related to President Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS.
  • A five-person commission, appointed by the acting attorney general and overseen by the president, will manage the fund.
  • Republicans are considering adding rules or limits on the fund in the spending bill or through amendments.
  • If Republicans do not act, Democrats may propose amendments to restrict the fund.
  • The Senate plans to pass the bill using reconciliation, which requires only a simple majority of 51 votes.
  • Senate vote sessions called “vote-a-rama” allow unlimited amendments before final approval.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

America trains these doctors — then forces them to leave

America trains these doctors — then forces them to leave

Summary

Hundreds of doctors who finished their training in U.S. hospitals this year may have to leave the country. This is because their paperwork to stay and work has been delayed, which could hurt communities that already lack enough medical care.

Key Facts

  • Many doctors completed their training in hospitals across the United States this year.
  • These doctors need official paperwork to stay and work after their training.
  • Processing of this paperwork has been delayed.
  • Due to the delays, these doctors might have to leave the U.S.
  • The departure of these doctors could reduce medical care in underserved communities.
  • Underserved communities are areas with fewer doctors and less access to healthcare.
  • These doctors were trained in the U.S. but not allowed to continue working due to visa or administrative issues.
  • The situation may worsen shortages of medical staff in certain regions.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Zohran Mamdani-Backed Progressive Poised To Defeat Incumbent Democrat—Poll

Zohran Mamdani-Backed Progressive Poised To Defeat Incumbent Democrat—Poll

Summary

A new poll shows Brad Lander, supported by New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, is leading over incumbent Democrat Dan Goldman in the primary race for New York's 10th Congressional District. The poll reflects strong support from progressive voters, especially younger people, as the election approaches on June 23.

Key Facts

  • Brad Lander has 57% support compared to Dan Goldman's 23% in a recent Emerson College poll.
  • The poll surveyed 450 likely voters between May 16-17 with a margin of error of ±4.6%.
  • Dan Goldman is the current representative but is seen by some as less progressive and has faced criticism for his support of Israel.
  • Lander’s strongest support comes from voters under 40, who prefer him 73% to 15%.
  • Older voters (over 70) are more evenly split between Lander and Goldman.
  • An earlier poll from Schoen Cooperman Research showed a closer race but still favored Lander.
  • Prediction markets give Lander a high chance (88% to 94%) of winning the primary.
  • The district includes parts of Manhattan and Brooklyn, with mixed political views depending on the neighborhood.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

From us

You're the one who keeps this going

No ads, no paywall. Pay what you want to keep it that way — suggested $3.99/month.

Support us
Former head of Minnesota nonprofit gets nearly 42-year prison sentence for fraud

Former head of Minnesota nonprofit gets nearly 42-year prison sentence for fraud

Summary

A former leader of a Minnesota nonprofit, Aimee Bock, was sentenced to nearly 42 years in prison for her role in a $250 million fraud case involving fake food program claims. The case was part of a wider investigation into social service fraud in Minnesota, which influenced federal immigration enforcement actions in the area during President Trump’s administration.

Key Facts

  • Aimee Bock led Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit accused of submitting false claims to get federal funds meant for feeding children.
  • Bock was convicted of conspiracy, wire fraud, and bribery and sentenced to nearly 42 years in prison.
  • Prosecutors said the nonprofit operated like a cash pipeline for fraudulent claims and kickbacks.
  • The fraud case contributed to President Trump sending more federal officers to Minneapolis-Saint Paul, leading to protests and two deaths.
  • Several others, including Fahima Mahamud from a childcare center, face charges for similar fraud involving federal funds.
  • Some accused billed Medicaid for services not provided, like housing support and autism therapy.
  • Most defendants in these cases are from Minnesota’s Somali community, though most are U.S. citizens.
  • President Trump has criticized Minnesota and its Somali community in connection with these fraud cases and pledged strict immigration enforcement.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Five arrested after police investigate alleged electoral fraud in Tameside

Five arrested after police investigate alleged electoral fraud in Tameside

Summary

Five people were arrested in Tameside as police investigate allegations of using fake independent candidates to affect a local election. The case involves claims that candidates were used to split votes and help the Labour party win a council seat.

Key Facts

  • Five people (four men and one woman, aged 23 to 47) were arrested on suspicion of fraud.
  • The investigation focuses on how candidates were put forward and if election laws were followed.
  • The investigation concerns the St Peter’s ward election in Tameside in May.
  • Labour’s Atta Ul-Rasool won the seat by 177 votes over independent candidate Ahmed Mehmood.
  • Two other independent candidates received 291 votes combined but had little campaign activity.
  • One candidate said she was unaware she was standing for election.
  • The election result is being challenged by a councillor who managed one independent candidate’s campaign.
  • No charges have been filed yet; the police inquiry is ongoing.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Read the DNC's full post-election autopsy for the 2024 campaign

Read the DNC's full post-election autopsy for the 2024 campaign

Summary

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) released a detailed report analyzing their 2024 election performance. The report highlights problems with how the party connects to voters in the Midwest and South and suggests changes to improve future campaigns.

Key Facts

  • The report was released by DNC Chair Ken Martin after pressure from party members.
  • It is 192 pages long and was finished in December 2024.
  • The report was written by Democratic consultant Paul Rivera.
  • It urges the party to focus more on voters in Middle America and the South.
  • These voters feel left out of the Democratic Party’s vision for America.
  • Many Americans face issues like poor healthcare access, job losses in manufacturing, and bad infrastructure.
  • The report says these voters often vote against their own interests because they don’t feel represented by the Democrats.
  • The report aims to help the party better connect with those voters in future elections.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Read the DOJ's memo to Republican senators on how Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund will work

Read the DOJ's memo to Republican senators on how Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund will work

Summary

The Justice Department shared a memo explaining how President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion "anti-weaponization fund" will be used. This fund was created after a legal settlement with the IRS following a lawsuit about Trump's leaked tax returns.

Key Facts

  • The Justice Department released a memo clarifying details of the "anti-weaponization fund."
  • The fund totals approximately $1.776 billion.
  • It was set up after President Trump and the IRS settled a lawsuit about his leaked tax returns.
  • The memo was given to Republican senators.
  • Lawmakers had questions about who would gain from the fund and how President Trump might control it.
  • The memo is one page and summarizes how the fund will operate.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Democrats belatedly publish 2024 presidential election autopsy report

Democrats belatedly publish 2024 presidential election autopsy report

Summary

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) has finally released a report analyzing their 2024 election losses, after initially deciding to keep it private. The report looks at voter groups the Democrats lost and campaign issues but does not address factors like President Biden’s age or US support for Israel’s war on Gaza.

Key Facts

  • The DNC chair, Ken Martin, first chose not to publish the report to focus on upcoming midterm elections.
  • The report was written by strategist Paul Rivera and examines why Kamala Harris and other Democrats lost key voter groups.
  • It highlights losses among Latinos, men, and rural voters and compares different state races.
  • The report discusses campaign spending and the need to engage new voters with better messaging.
  • It does not mention President Biden’s age or the US involvement in the Israel-Gaza conflict as reasons for losses.
  • Martin apologized for the delay and said the report’s quality did not meet his standards.
  • The report includes disclaimers that many claims are unverified and that the DNC did not have all source data.
  • Some parts of the report contain disputed statements, including those about the January 6 Capitol attack.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Judge dismisses trial against former Virginia assistant principal in case of 6-year-old with gun

Judge dismisses trial against former Virginia assistant principal in case of 6-year-old with gun

Summary

A judge ended the trial of Ebony Parker, a former assistant principal in Virginia, after three days of evidence from the prosecution. The case involved an incident with a 6-year-old child who had a gun.

Key Facts

  • Ebony Parker was the assistant principal at Richneck Elementary School in Newport News, Virginia.
  • She faced a trial related to a case involving a 6-year-old child with a gun.
  • The judge dismissed the trial after the prosecution presented three days of their case.
  • The dismissal means the trial will not continue at this time.
  • The trial ending suggests there was not enough evidence to proceed.
  • The incident took place in a school setting involving young children.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

From us

The news is free. Support if you want.

No ads. Pay what this is worth to you — most people choose $3.99/month.

Support us
Minnesota Fraud Update: 'Mastermind' Aimee Bock Gets 41-Year Sentence

Minnesota Fraud Update: 'Mastermind' Aimee Bock Gets 41-Year Sentence

Summary

Aimee Bock, leader of a Minnesota nonprofit, was sentenced to over 41 years in prison for running a $250 million pandemic-related fraud. She was convicted of wire fraud, conspiracy, and bribery for falsely reporting meals served to children and must pay $242 million back.

Key Facts

  • Aimee Bock founded Feeding Our Future, a nonprofit that falsely claimed to provide 91 million meals to children.
  • She was sentenced to 500 months (41.5 years) in prison by a federal judge in Minneapolis.
  • Bock was convicted in March 2025 of wire fraud, conspiracy, and bribery.
  • The fraud scheme exploited a federally funded child nutrition program during the pandemic.
  • Prosecutors called the case the nation’s largest pandemic fraud, involving $250 million in stolen funds.
  • Bock has denied being the mastermind and blamed regulators and former employees instead.
  • The case initially involved 47 defendants, growing to 78, mostly of Somali descent; many pleaded guilty or were convicted.
  • Federal agents said the stolen money was used for luxury goods instead of feeding children.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Lindell says he’ll file ‘anti-weaponization’ fund claim

Lindell says he’ll file ‘anti-weaponization’ fund claim

Summary

Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow, announced he will ask for money from a new government fund that pays people who say the government treated them unfairly. This fund has nearly $1.8 billion available to settle these complaints. Lindell claims his company lost money after he shared false statements about President Trump.

Key Facts

  • The Department of Justice created a fund called the “anti-weaponization” fund.
  • The fund has about $1.8 billion to resolve claims against the government.
  • Mike Lindell is the CEO of MyPillow.
  • Lindell says he will file a claim to get compensation from this fund.
  • Lindell’s company lost millions after he spread false information about President Trump.
  • The fund aims to settle grievances related to alleged government misconduct.
  • The announcement of Lindell’s claim happened soon after the fund was created.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Facial recognition may become immigration enforcement’s most powerful tool

Facial recognition may become immigration enforcement’s most powerful tool

Summary

ICE officers use a mobile app called Mobile Fortify that helps them quickly find out if an immigrant has overstayed their visa and can be deported. This app uses facial recognition technology to identify individuals more easily during immigration enforcement.

Key Facts

  • ICE stands for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, a U.S. government agency.
  • The Mobile Fortify application helps officers identify immigrants who may be deportable.
  • Facial recognition technology matches faces to immigration records.
  • The app can determine if someone has stayed longer in the U.S. than their visa allows.
  • This technology aims to make immigration enforcement faster and more accurate.
  • The system is used in the field by ICE officers on mobile devices.
  • This represents a growing use of technology in U.S. immigration enforcement.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Reckoning Action organization targets American misogyny, pushes congressional accountability

Reckoning Action organization targets American misogyny, pushes congressional accountability

Summary

Reckoning Action is a group started by Cheyenne Hunt. It aims to fight against unfair treatment of women and gender bias in the United States. The group is also working to make members of Congress responsible for these issues.

Key Facts

  • Reckoning Action is an advocacy group focused on gender equality.
  • The group was founded by Cheyenne Hunt.
  • Their goal is to address misogyny, which means discrimination against women.
  • They want to stop gender bias in American society.
  • Reckoning Action pushes for accountability from Congress on these issues.
  • The organization was covered in a CBS News report by Nancy Cordes.
  • They use different actions to raise awareness and gather support.
  • The work is focused on improving women's rights and fairness in lawmaking.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Cassidy: Congress should decide $1.776B fund for Trump allies

Cassidy: Congress should decide $1.776B fund for Trump allies

Summary

Senator Bill Cassidy said Congress should approve the nearly $1.8 billion fund created by the Department of Justice. The fund is meant to prevent the misuse of government power and is related to President Donald Trump and his allies.

Key Facts

  • Senator Bill Cassidy is from Louisiana and is a member of the Republican Party.
  • The Department of Justice created a $1.8 billion fund this week.
  • The fund is described as an “anti-weaponization” measure to prevent misuse of government power.
  • Cassidy says Congress should decide whether to approve this fund.
  • Some people are worried about daily expenses like housing, groceries, and gas costs.
  • The fund is linked to issues involving President Donald Trump and his allies.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

South Carolina's legislature expected to advance Republican-led congressional map

South Carolina's legislature expected to advance Republican-led congressional map

Summary

South Carolina's Republican lawmakers are likely to approve a new map for congressional districts in the state. This change will define how voting areas are organized for upcoming elections.

Key Facts

  • Republican state lawmakers in South Carolina are leading efforts to create a new congressional district map.
  • The legislature is expected to move forward with this new map soon.
  • The congressional map determines the boundaries voters in South Carolina use to elect their U.S. House representatives.
  • Political strategist Antjuan Seawright provided insight about this process.
  • The update comes ahead of future elections and may impact political representation in South Carolina.
  • The news was reported by CBS News and includes commentary on the political implications.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

From us

Support no-spin news

The site stays free. If The Actual News is worth something to you, chip in.

Support us
Watch live: DOJ, HHS officials give briefing on Minnesota fraud probe

Watch live: DOJ, HHS officials give briefing on Minnesota fraud probe

Summary

Officials from the Department of Justice and the Department of Health and Human Services held a briefing about an ongoing investigation into possible fraud in Minnesota's social service programs. The investigation is connected to actions taken during President Donald Trump’s administration.

Key Facts

  • The briefing involved senior officials from DOJ and HHS.
  • The investigation focuses on alleged fraud in Minnesota’s social service programs.
  • Colin McDonald, assistant attorney general for fraud enforcement, participated in the briefing.
  • HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. also took part.
  • The probe relates to activities during President Donald Trump’s administration.
  • The update was scheduled for Thursday morning.
  • The investigation aims to identify and address misuse of government resources.
  • Social service programs provide aid and support to people in need.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Durbin warns DOJ against compensating ‘rioters’ in ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

Durbin warns DOJ against compensating ‘rioters’ in ‘anti-weaponization’ fund

Summary

Senator Dick Durbin is opposing the Department of Justice's plan to use a $1.776 billion fund to compensate people who claim the legal system was unfairly used against them, including those involved in the January 6, 2021 Capitol attack. Durbin, a leading Democrat, warns against paying rioters through this fund.

Key Facts

  • The Department of Justice has set up a $1.776 billion fund to compensate people alleging unfair legal treatment.
  • Some individuals seeking compensation were involved in the January 6 Capitol riot.
  • Senator Dick Durbin, a Democrat from Illinois and top member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, opposes this use of the fund.
  • Durbin warns that rioters should not receive payment from the compensation program.
  • The fund is part of efforts described as addressing the “anti-weaponization” of the legal system.
  • The debate focuses on who is eligible to receive money from this federal fund.
  • The Capitol riot on January 6, 2021, involved a violent breach of the U.S. Capitol building.
  • The Justice Department’s compensation fund aims to help those who believe the legal process was misused against them.
Read the Original

Want the full story? Tap a source to open the original article.

Save articles & personalize your feed — Create a free account